Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) enshrines the fundamental right to life, asserting that every individual's life is protected by law. It outlines the conditions under which deprivation of life is permissible, such as in self-defense or during armed conflict, emphasizing the state's duty to investigate any suspicious deaths. Understanding Article 2 is crucial for grasping the core principles of human rights in Europe, as it underscores the importance of protecting life and ensuring accountability.
Millions of flashcards designed to help you ace your studies
Sign up for freeWhat are some of the European Court of Human Rights' (ECtHR) crucial functions in relation to Article 2 ECHR?
What are the distinctions between positive and negative obligations in Article 2 ECHR?
Has the European Court of Human Rights recognized a right to die through euthanasia or assisted suicide under Article 2 ECHR?
What are the key elements of Article 2 ECHR Right to Life?
What are the three primary exceptions that allow a state to take life according to Article 2 ECHR?
What is the significance of R (Amin) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2003] UKHL 51 in Article 2 ECHR case law?
What principle did the ECtHR emphasize in McCann v United Kingdom, App. No. 18984/91 (1995)?
What did the ECtHR hold in Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v Portugal, App. No. 56080/13 (2017)?
What is one of the most contentious issues under Article 2 ECHR related to the right to life?
What principles must the use of lethal force by law enforcement officers comply with, in the context of Article 2 ECHR?
What are the criteria for awarding damages in Article 2 ECHR cases?
What are some of the European Court of Human Rights' (ECtHR) crucial functions in relation to Article 2 ECHR?
What are the distinctions between positive and negative obligations in Article 2 ECHR?
Has the European Court of Human Rights recognized a right to die through euthanasia or assisted suicide under Article 2 ECHR?
What are the key elements of Article 2 ECHR Right to Life?
What are the three primary exceptions that allow a state to take life according to Article 2 ECHR?
What is the significance of R (Amin) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2003] UKHL 51 in Article 2 ECHR case law?
What principle did the ECtHR emphasize in McCann v United Kingdom, App. No. 18984/91 (1995)?
What did the ECtHR hold in Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v Portugal, App. No. 56080/13 (2017)?
What is one of the most contentious issues under Article 2 ECHR related to the right to life?
What principles must the use of lethal force by law enforcement officers comply with, in the context of Article 2 ECHR?
What are the criteria for awarding damages in Article 2 ECHR cases?
Achieve better grades quicker with Premium
Geld-zurück-Garantie, wenn du durch die Prüfung fällst
Review generated flashcards
Start learning or create your own AI flashcards
Team Article 2 echr Teachers
Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) is the provision that protects the right to life. It states that every individual's life shall be protected by law, and it includes specific conditions under which life may be lawfully taken.
Article 2 of the ECHR is a cornerstone of human rights within Europe, as it establishes the fundamental right to life. It articulates that:
The significance of Article 2 cannot be overstated. It embodies the value that democratic societies place on the sanctity of human life. This article is not only vital for protecting individual rights but also establishes accountability for state actions. For instance:
Right to Life is a fundamental principle protected under Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which asserts that every individual's life shall be protected by law.
Article 2 ECHR emphasizes the need for legal protection of life. Key principles include:
An example of the application of Article 2 ECHR can be observed in cases where law enforcement uses lethal force. For instance, if police shoot a suspect during an armed robbery, the incident must be investigated to determine if the force used was indeed 'absolutely necessary' under the circumstances.
Remember, Article 2 not only protects individuals from state actions but also mandates investigations into any deaths linked to state involvement.
The case law surrounding Article 2 highlights its breadth and the European Court of Human Rights' interpretation. Noteworthy rulings demonstrate how the Court has framed the obligations of states in various situations. For example:
The case of McCann v. United Kingdom is a pivotal example demonstrating the implications of Article 2 ECHR. In this case, the European Court of Human Rights addressed the events surrounding a police operation in which three suspected members of a terrorist group were shot. The Court held that the UK government had violated Article 2 because the authorities failed to conduct an effective investigation into the killings. Key takeaways from this case include:
In the case of Öneryıldız v. Turkey, the Court examined the issue of the right to life in connection with environmental hazards. The case arose after a refuse tip exploded, resulting in several fatalities. The Court concluded that Turkey had inadequately addressed the risks associated with the refuse site, violating Article 2 ECHR. This case illustrates the following points:
In studying these cases, focus on understanding how the Court's interpretations shape state responsibilities regarding the right to life.
The case of Guidice v. Italy provides insight into the obligations of states concerning the right to life. This case involved a man whose death was linked to police negligence during a public demonstration. The Court found that Italy had violated Article 2 due to the lack of adequate procedures to protect the life of individuals involved in the demonstration.Important reflections from this ruling include:
The implications of these case studies highlight the broader human rights obligations of states. The European Court of Human Rights plays a crucial role in interpreting Article 2 ECHR in diverse contexts, stressing how state actions must prioritize the protection of human life. Notably, the court’s stance reiterates that the obligation to protect life is not just reactive but also encompasses proactive measures to prevent death. Each case examined illustrates the necessity for states to adopt comprehensive policies that address various risks to life, ranging from police actions to environmental safety. The consistent theme is the Court's insistence on accountability and the need for states to maintain high standards of public safety and rights protection.
Sign up for free to gain access to all our flashcards.
At StudySmarter, we have created a learning platform that serves millions of students. Meet the people who work hard to deliver fact based content as well as making sure it is verified.
Lily Hulatt is a Digital Content Specialist with over three years of experience in content strategy and curriculum design. She gained her PhD in English Literature from Durham University in 2022, taught in Durham University’s English Studies Department, and has contributed to a number of publications. Lily specialises in English Literature, English Language, History, and Philosophy.
Get to know Lily
Gabriel Freitas is an AI Engineer with a solid experience in software development, machine learning algorithms, and generative AI, including large language models’ (LLMs) applications. Graduated in Electrical Engineering at the University of São Paulo, he is currently pursuing an MSc in Computer Engineering at the University of Campinas, specializing in machine learning topics. Gabriel has a strong background in software engineering and has worked on projects involving computer vision, embedded AI, and LLM applications.
Get to know Gabriel