Of course, John is having nothing but bad luck. But, by saying he is having good luck, he expresses his frustration and amazement at how bad everything is going. This is an example of verbal irony and its effects.
Fig. 1 - Verbal irony is saying "What great luck!" when everything is going wrong.
Verbal Irony: Definition
To start, what is verbal irony?
Verbal irony: a rhetorical device that occurs when a speaker says one thing but means another.
Verbal Irony: Examples
There are many famous examples of verbal irony in literature.
For example, there is verbal irony in Jonathan Swift's satirical essay, "A Modest Proposal" (1729).
In this essay, Swift argues that people should eat poor children to solve the problem of poverty in Ireland. This striking yet fake argument draws attention to the problem of poverty. He writes:
I am not in the least pain upon that matter, because it is very well known, that they are every day dying, and rotting, by cold and famine, and filth, and vermin, as fast as can be reasonably expected.
Swift is using verbal irony here because he is claiming that he does not care about the issue of poverty when, in fact, he does. If he didn't care about the issue, he would not be writing an essay that draws attention to it. His use of verbal irony allows him to highlight how problematic it is that people do not care about the topic.
There is verbal irony in William Shakespeare's play, Julius Caesar (1599).
In Act III, Scene II, Mark Anthony gives a speech after Brutus kills Caesar. He uses verbal irony by complimenting Brutus and calling him "noble" and "honorable" while also praising Caesar. In doing so, he is actually criticizing Brutus for killing Caesar:
The noble Brutus
Hath told you Caesar was ambitious:
If it were so, it was a grievous fault,
And grievously hath Casar answer'd it.
Throughout this speech, Mark Anthony shows that Caesar was a good person who was not as ambitious and dangerous as Brutus claimed. This makes his praise of Brutus ironic and suggests that Brutus was actually the one in the wrong.
Effects of Verbal Irony
Verbal irony is a useful device because it provides insight into who a speaker is.
Imagine someone is reading a book, and a character makes use of verbal irony whenever they are in a bad situation. This tells the reader that this character is the type of person who tries to make light of bad times.
Verbal irony also expresses strong emotion.
Recall the example from the beginning of the article where everything is going wrong for John. By saying he is having good luck when he is really having bad luck, he is emphasizing his feelings of frustration.
Verbal irony also frequently makes people laugh.
Imagine you are on a picnic with a friend, and there is a sudden downpour. Your friend laughs and says, "Wonderful day for a picnic, huh?" Here, your friend is trying to make you laugh and make the best of a bad situation.
Fig. 2 - "Wonderful day for a picnic, huh?"
Since verbal irony is good at providing insight into characters, authors use the device to help develop their characters' points of view.
William Shakespeare's use of verbal irony in Mark Anthony's speech in Julius Caesar helps the audience understand Mark Anthony's perspective on the events of the play.
Authors also use verbal irony to emphasize important ideas.
In "A Modest Proposal," Jonathan Swift emphasizes the importance of addressing poverty by using verbal irony.
Difference Between Verbal Irony and Sarcasm
Verbal irony might seem sarcastic, but verbal irony and sarcasm are actually different. Although people might use verbal irony to say one thing but convey another, the device isn't used to mock someone or be negative. When people say something with the intention of meaning the opposite to mock others or themselves, that is when they are using sarcasm.
Sarcasm: a type of verbal irony in which a speaker mocks a situation.
There is sarcasm in J. D. Salinger's book, The Catcher in the Rye (1951).
The main character Holden Caufield uses sarcasm when he is leaving his boarding school. As he leaves, he yells, "Sleep tight, ya morons!" (Chapter 8). Holden does not really want the others students to sleep well. Instead, he is telling them to sleep tight in order to convey feelings of frustration and to mock the other students. Since he is using irony to ridicule others, this is an example of sarcasm.
There is sarcasm in William Shakespeare's play The Merchant of Venice (1600).
The character Portia has a suitor named Monsieur le Bon. She does not like him, and, when she is discussing him, she says, "God made him and therefore let him pass for a man" (Act I, Scene II). By saying, "let him pass for a man," Portia is suggesting that Monsieur le Bon is not actually a man. Here, she is deliberately saying one thing to mean something negative and insulting. Since she is using irony to mock others, this is an example of sarcasm.
Difference Between Verbal Irony and Socratic Irony
It is also important to distinguish verbal irony from Socratic irony.
Socratic irony: a type of irony in which a person pretends to be ignorant and asks a question that deliberately exposes a weakness in others' points.
The term Socratic irony comes from the Greek philosopher Socrates, who developed a method of argumentation. His Socratic method involves asking people questions to help them better understand and discover weaknesses in their own points of view. Socratic irony occurs when a person pretends not to understand another's argument and deliberately asks a question to reveal a weakness in it.
There is Socratic irony in the Greek philosopher Plato's book, The Republic (375 BC).
In The Republic, Socrates uses Socratic irony when speaking to orators called Sophists. In Book I, Section III, he speaks to Thrasymachus and pretends to be ignorant about the topic of justice. He says:
And why, when we are seeking for justice, a thing more precious than many pieces of gold, do you say that we are weakly yielding to one another and not doing our utmost to get at the truth? Nay, my good friend, we are most willing and anxious to do so, but the fact is that we cannot. And if so, you people who know all things should pity us and not be angry with us.
Here Socrates feigns ignorance about justice so that Thrasymachus will speak on the topic. Socrates actually knows quite a lot about justice and truth, but he pretends not to because he wants to expose the weaknesses in Thrasymachus's argument. He is deliberately asking a question to reveal another's lack of knowledge. This is not verbal irony because he is not saying something to mean the opposite; instead, he is pretending to not know something in order to reveal something.
Fig. 3 - The Death of Socrates, painted by Jacques-Louis David in 1787.
Difference Between Verbal Irony and Overstatement
It is also easy to confuse overstatement with verbal irony.
Overstatement: Otherwise known as hyperbole, overstatement is a figure of speech in which the speaker deliberately exaggerates to create emphasis.
An Olympic athlete might say: "I would die from happiness if I won first place."
Of course, the athlete would not actually die from happiness if they won first place, but the athlete emphasizes the importance of winning to them by saying this. Overstatement is different than verbal irony because the speaker is saying more than is necessary, not saying one thing to mean another.
Verbal Irony - Key takeaways
- Verbal irony occurs when a speaker says one thing but means another.
- Authors use verbal irony to develop characters, emphasize important ideas, and create humor.
- Overstatement is not the same as verbal irony. Overstatement occurs when a speaker uses exaggeration to make a strong point. Verbal irony occurs when a speaker says one thing but means another.
- Socratic irony is different from verbal irony. Socratic irony occurs when a person pretends to be ignorant and deliberately asks a question that reveals a weakness in another's argument.
- Sarcasm is different from verbal irony. Sarcasm occurs when a person mocks themselves or someone else by saying one thing when they mean something else.
How we ensure our content is accurate and trustworthy?
At StudySmarter, we have created a learning platform that serves millions of students. Meet
the people who work hard to deliver fact based content as well as making sure it is verified.
Content Creation Process:
Lily Hulatt is a Digital Content Specialist with over three years of experience in content strategy and curriculum design. She gained her PhD in English Literature from Durham University in 2022, taught in Durham University’s English Studies Department, and has contributed to a number of publications. Lily specialises in English Literature, English Language, History, and Philosophy.
Get to know Lily
Content Quality Monitored by:
Gabriel Freitas is an AI Engineer with a solid experience in software development, machine learning algorithms, and generative AI, including large language models’ (LLMs) applications. Graduated in Electrical Engineering at the University of São Paulo, he is currently pursuing an MSc in Computer Engineering at the University of Campinas, specializing in machine learning topics. Gabriel has a strong background in software engineering and has worked on projects involving computer vision, embedded AI, and LLM applications.
Get to know Gabriel