Gendered language
In the case of the English language, the term ‘gendered language’ does not refer to the masculine or feminine labels given to nouns, as, unlike languages such as French and Spanish, English does not have grammatical gender. Instead, gendered language in this instance means:
Language that carries a bias towards a specific sex or gender.
Language and gender inequality
The use of gendered language can often lead to gender inequality, which creates an unfair bias towards a certain gender. This can result in harmful stereotypes which cause discrimination and portray a negative view of a certain gender. These stereotypes and negative views are often directed at women. For many years, women did not have the same rights and opportunities as men, such as not being able to vote or access certain public places, like pubs. The use of gendered language has the power to reinforce and maintain male supremacy in society.
Below are some examples of gendered language:
Examples of gendered language
Mr and Mrs
‘Mr’ can be used to refer to any man, regardless of his marital status. However, there are different terms to use for a woman, depending on her marital status. ‘Miss’ is used if she is not married. ‘Mrs’ is used if she is married. ‘Ms’ is a more neutral term for women who do not wish to disclose their marital status. The use of different terms for women and not men could be seen as problematic as it portrays the idea that their lives are defined only by the relationships they have with men.
Throughout history, a woman’s role in society has been closely associated with her marital status, which is why women use different titles. This highlights the privilege of men and the status they already have in society without being expected to marry someone.
Gender-biased job titles
In the past, gender roles were followed more strictly and there was a clearer divide between the expected roles for men and women. Men were seen as the main earners, whereas women looked after the children and carried out unpaid domestic work, like cooking and cleaning.
Some gender-biased job titles include:
Policeman
Fireman
Postman
Chairman
Cameraman
Notice how they all end in man! The use of these jobs titles is problematic as it excludes the word women, implying that only men are fit for these positions… We all know now that women are able to work in any of the above jobs! However, the language we use when describing these jobs continues to cement the idea that they are typically done by men. This portrays men as strong and smart, and women are forgotten or overlooked.
Gendered Greetings
How many times have you heard “Ladies and gentlemen” or “Hello sir/madam”? Although they are used to address both male and females and are not biased towards one specific gender at a time, these greetings are still gendered. Because of this, they are not inclusive to people who do not associate with those binary terms.
Examples of gender-inclusive language
Gender-Neutral Job Titles
In today’s society, more job titles either have a female equivalent or are gender-neutral. Gender-neutral job titles can be seen as better as they do not carry a bias towards any sex or gender. Using these titles helps to limit negative stereotypes surrounding certain jobs and reduces inequality faced by women, as anyone is able to use them, not just men.
Instead of using gendered terms such as 'business man' or 'business woman', we can say 'business person'
Examples of gender-neutral job titles include:
Police Officer (instead of Policeman)
Fire Fighter (instead of Fireman)
Postal Worker (instead of Postman)
Chair/Chairperson (instead of Chairman)
Camera Operator (instead of Cameraman)
Gender-neutral greetings
Instead of using greetings such as ladies and gentlemen or sir/madam, it is becoming more common to use neutral greetings such as everyone or folks to be more inclusive towards non-binary people.
Gender differences in language use
It has been argued that men and women use language in different ways, which reflects how they view themselves in society and how others perceive them. A variety of theories have been developed by linguists to study the ways that men and women use language. This allows us to gain a deeper understanding of possible similarities and differences between genders through the language we use in conversation.
Let's look at a basic overview of four of these theories.
Language and gender theories
Difference Theory
The difference theory simply aims to prove that men and women do speak in different ways. But, this does not mean that one way is better than the other. A supporter of this theory is Deborah Tannen. In her book, You Just Don’t Understand (1990), Tannen explores these differences. Below is a summary of her findings:
MEN: | WOMEN: |
See communication as a competition to gain status | Communicate to gain the support of others |
Are more independent | Are more dependent on others |
Try to fix problems | Try to find sympathy from others |
Talk briefly about facts | Talk lots about their feelings |
Are more direct and give more demands | Are more indirect and give suggestions |
More likely to express opinions and argue against others | Less likely to cause conflict |
What do you think of this theory? Do you see any problems with the way men and women are presented?
Dominance Theory
The dominance theory is the idea that the language men use is superior and holds more dominance in society, whereas the language women use is seen as inferior. This theory could be seen as problematic as it suggests that men have more authority over women, and women should be submissive. Some supporters of this theory include linguists such as Don Zimmerman, Candace West, Pamela Fishman and Dale Spender.
In 1975, Zimmerman and West conducted a study titled Sex Roles, Interruptions and Silences in Conversation (1975). In the study, they recorded 31 conversations between two people at a time. Ten of these conversations were between just men, 10 between just women, and 11 between both men and women. Below is a summary of their findings:
Men:
Women:
Were silent more, and for longer periods of time.
Only interrupted other women, not men.
Deficit Theory
The deficit theory is the idea that the language men use is seen as the standard, whereas the language women use differs from the standard and is seen as insufficient. This theory could be seen as sexist as it portrays women as weaker and of lower status, highlighting the inequality faced by women. Supporters of this theory include Otto Jespersen and Robin Lakoff.
Below are some of the findings from Otto Jespersen’s book, Language: Its Nature, Development and Origin (1922):
WOMEN
Talk a lot.
Use simpler words as they have smaller vocabularies.
Use more false starts and unfinished sentences because they speak before they think.
Exaggerate more.
Use too many adjectives and adverbs.
Are emotional, not grammatical.
Are more indirect, so are not as effective as men.
MEN
Below are some of the findings from Robin Lakoff’s book, Language and Women’s Place (1975):
Women use more: | Examples: |
Backchannelling | “Uh-huh”, “Mm”, “Yeah” |
Hedging | “Sort of”, “Kind of” |
Intensifiers | “Very”, “So” |
Apologies | “I’m sorry, but…” |
Tag questions | “You live here, right?” “You sing, don’t you?” |
Modal verbs | “Could”, “Should”, “Ought to” |
Wh- Imperatives | “Why don’t we…” |
Indirect commands | “It’s cold in here” indirectly means: close the window |
Diminutives (pet names) | “Honey”, “Sweetie”, “Darling” |
Women may use these things more than men BUT they use less:
Slang.
Swear words.
Insults.
And perhaps the most sexist observation of all…
If reading any of the theories so far has got you looking like this...
Gender-related topics in English Language can be frustrating! Pixabay
You are not alone!
Diversity Theory
The diversity theory argues that there is a difference between sex and gender. It also suggests that the sex we are assigned at birth does not affect the language we use. Instead, the roles we have in society and the way we interact socially influences our language. Supporters of this theory include Deborah Cameron and Judith Butler.
Deborah Cameron believes that difference is a myth. Her research takes inspiration from contemporary theorists who challenge the idea that men and women use different language. She thinks that the differences in gender are because of the expectations placed on us by society. She coined the term ‘verbal hygiene’ in her 2012 book of the same name, to refer to the ways in which people think they are supposed to speak in order to fit into the norm and meet the expectations of a correct society.
Which theory do you agree with most?
Language and Gender - Key takeaways
Gendered language is language that is biased towards a certain sex or gender. It can cause and help maintain gender inequality.
Gender-neutral language does not carry a bias towards a certain sex or gender. It is inclusive.
- The 'Difference theory' focuses on the idea that men and women communicate in different ways.
- The 'Dominance theory' focuses on the dominance of the language men use, as opposed to women.
- The 'Deficit theory' focuses on men’s language being the standard, and women’s language being insufficient as it differs from the standard.
- The 'Diversity theory' focuses on the idea that the sex we are assigned at birth does not affect our language use, but our place in society and the way we socialise does.
How we ensure our content is accurate and trustworthy?
At StudySmarter, we have created a learning platform that serves millions of students. Meet
the people who work hard to deliver fact based content as well as making sure it is verified.
Content Creation Process:
Lily Hulatt is a Digital Content Specialist with over three years of experience in content strategy and curriculum design. She gained her PhD in English Literature from Durham University in 2022, taught in Durham University’s English Studies Department, and has contributed to a number of publications. Lily specialises in English Literature, English Language, History, and Philosophy.
Get to know Lily
Content Quality Monitored by:
Gabriel Freitas is an AI Engineer with a solid experience in software development, machine learning algorithms, and generative AI, including large language models’ (LLMs) applications. Graduated in Electrical Engineering at the University of São Paulo, he is currently pursuing an MSc in Computer Engineering at the University of Campinas, specializing in machine learning topics. Gabriel has a strong background in software engineering and has worked on projects involving computer vision, embedded AI, and LLM applications.
Get to know Gabriel